Tuesday, June 29, 2021

M2 Potential client questions and proposal amendments (from P3 practice pitch)

In this post I will be transcribing questions that I received during my P3 Practice pitch along with my answers. These will imitate what a potential client could ask. 

Question: "Do you believe there is opportunity for further seasons of this concept?" 

Answer: Yes I believe that there is the potential for future seasons because the program finishes on a sort of cliff hangar with the main protagonist being imprisoned thus creating the opportunity for season two to take a prison break approach. In addition the characters and ideas in this program would be very relatable and aim to hook the audience on a euphoric/entertained feeling. All the best programmes you are left quite down when they finish. 

Question: "How would you distribute and promote this TV drama?" 

Answer: This TV drama would be primarily distributed through below the line mediums through social media as this is proved to be most effective to the younger target audience that this program is aimed at. In addition the effectiveness of this method alongside the cheaper price best fits into the lower budget. Some above the line routes would be taken such as TV/iplayer promotion after related programmes. This would be useful as I could use the BBC's cross platform synergy and direct a much wider audience. It would be promoted using rave era branding and with a more vintage ident despite the younger audience and 2020 setting. I believe this would be effective because many Gen Z people seek to educate themselves on and consume 'retro' products and it's very much in trend. 

Question: "How are you going to present drugs in your drama in a way that won't disturb viewers" 

Answer: I think that the presentation of drugs will disturb some more narrow minded viewers as it takes a very objective approach; the drug isn't negative and therefore it would not be portrayed negatively. This is purposeful as it means the program acts as a microcosm, reflecting the conflict in views that different generations have about drug use and it would attempt to tackle the closed views of older generations as well as educating younger viewers to the downsides. Other (non fictional) drugs would be portrayed negatively so the fictional 'Perfect drug' would serve to contrast them and show how bad those real drugs can be. 

Question: "Have you considered a title, I suggest 'The perfect drug'?" 

Answer: Originally I thought of naming the programme after the chemical symbols of a drug companies are making without side effects however when I researched into this I found out that the names and chemical names of these drugs aren't at all catchy and don't really fit well with a TV drama. I do like the name 'The Perfect Drug' as it has a sense of power to it so I may use this if I don't come up with another. 

Question: "You should reduce the content on your presentation to make it more digestible as well as branding it to fit the idea" 

Answer: I will make this amendment in time with my final pitch, using retro rave era branding through printing on ecstasy tablets etc. With fitting fonts, colours, images etc. 

Question: "Would it make more sense for the students in this program to be chemical/pharmacology students as opposed to medical students?" 

Answer: Yes it would, this is an amendment I'll make. 

Question: "Is this drug addictive?" 

Answer: No this drug is not addictive at its pure form and the whole purpose of the first episodes is to develop a beneficial drug without any side effects; a concept pharmaceutical companies have been working on. As the program progresses and the drug becomes wider spread and mass produced we see it become more addictive and consequential because speed is prioritised over quality and the group become more involved in 'street life'. Reflecting what has happened in history with drugs like marijuana. Addiction is covered by this program and is one of the motivational factors of the group to produce this helpful drug however as the creator becomes more powerful he gets addicted to this power, leading to this downfall. Allowing for the idea of greed to be covered and showing that it could be our fatal flaw. 

Question: "Is there an internal conflict in this group?" 

Answer: Yes there is an internal conflict within the friend group who initially work on developing and testing the drug. Some of them think it's a good idea to sell and distribute the drug and are very pushy to do so whilst others have the opposite view which leads to some betrayals and arguments within the group and as the group deteriorates so does the sanity and operation of the protagonist. It would outline the fragility that greed and money can bring to a friendship/relationship. There is also an internal conflict within the governmental group to show that greed and power affects all types of people and their relationships. 

Question: "Are you worried that this concept has been made already?" 

Answer: I'm aware that films and programmes with similar ideas do exist such as 'Limitless' or 'Lucy' however I believe that there are many factors which set my drama apart from these concepts. For example the younger and diverse cast along with the many UK locations not often represented would attract a completely different TA. The split narrative and crime/corruption aspect to this program has also not been done before with similar concepts and they often don't approach current societal/systemic issues. 

Question: "Do you think that the positive portrayal of drugs will fit with BBC3's ethos?" 

Answer: As mentioned earlier drugs on the whole would not be endorsed, only the fictional one so I do believe it is acceptable for BBC3's younger TA brief. In addition, I don't believe that the concepts or imagery will stray from their ethos as they often cover experimental/controversial ideas especially focussing on younger people in the UK (as my drama does.) 

Question: "Do you think that the BBC would invest in this as it could portray the government negatively?" 

Answer: I acknowledge that the BBC is funded by the government through tax payer money however I'm confident they will invest because this programme covers many other pressing issues and educates the viewer on them. Something the government would be neglecting if they refused funding, and they do have the obligation to fund good entertainment. So even if the government was partially portrayed negatively it wouldn't be too much of a problem because the advantages of government would also be shown along with many other important ideas and controversies. 

Monday, June 28, 2021

P3 Practice Pitch

Here is the video of my practice pitch using the first version of my powerpoint proposal. 


The first draft for the presentation (shown in the video) can be found with notes in my P2 Proposal post. 

Normally here I would embed the final draft of my presentation in preparation for the P4 final pitch however due to new guidance and COVID disruption this unit will finish and be marked from the M2 task. This means that I don't get the chance or time to improve/redesign my proposal using the feedback I received in the practice pitch as well as the notes I made myself. 

P2 Proposal

This is the first version of my proposal for a TV drama product in alignment with BBC3s brief. This outlines the different factors of production and purposes behind my theorised TV drama. 


To improve this pitch in preparation for the Final pitch i would need to summarise the information so it is readable for the listener as well as improving the branding so that it matches with the theme of the program. 
There are many improvements that I need to make to this pitch before pitching it to the BBC3 exec such as more refined and readable notes on the slides, filling the unfinished boxes and making the branding of the pitch (powerpoint) match with the identity of the program. 

Monday, April 26, 2021

M1 SWOT Analysis

This M1 task outlines feedback from someone else in my class about my three separate ideas. They will give me feedback on the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats to help me decide which idea is best. 

Idea 1: 


Idea 2: 


Idea 3:


Summary and decision: 

After considering the feedback on each of my 3 ideas I have decided on Idea 3.
For me the decision was between idea 1 and idea 3. Idea 2 just had too many drawbacks and threats - with the risk of disturbing the viewer because of relevant issues/trauma or even because it could possibly bring up a COVID death etc. Furthermore, with this idea there was the risk that the information is misleading and means influenced viewers put themselves in danger. I felt that although Idea 1 was probably the idea which left the most room for younger character development and issues, the plot development could be difficult and boring because I don't want to focus too much on relationships and this drama would probably rely on this for success. This eventually led me to choosing idea 3 to go forward with because despite the risks of going over budget or falling under 18 rating instead of 15 I feel that they would be manageable and the benefits outweigh them. The concept of a new beneficial drug with no side-effects which contrasts government manipulation is one that I like and I think it is a valuable USP especially when paired with a multi-stranded narrative like Killing Eve which proved to be successful in the crime drama category which also addressed global powers.

Friday, April 16, 2021

P1 Generating ideas

In this post I will be showing the mind-maps which I have made for 3 separate ideas for TV dramas in line with the BBC3 brief. 

Idea 1: 


Idea 2: 


Idea 3: 


Monday, March 22, 2021

'Attack the Block' - case study

Attack the Block was a hybrid genre film written and directed by British comedian Joe Cornish. It spanned across the sci-fi, horror, comedy and action genres which could've been one of the reasons why this film was financially unsuccessful as the audience is diluted. It was produced by Screen Gems, Film4, Studio canal and Big talk productions for around $13million with some funding from the UK film council and only made about half of that back in terms of box office takings. Apparently over time it eventually broke even but overall it was financially unsuccessful. The film featured John Boyega, Judie Whitaker and some less renowned actors. It was distributed in the UK by Optimum releasing and in the USA by Sony. 

Representation

At the beginning of this film the setting is established as well as the key characters and their alien opposition. It starts with a scene where predominantly black teenagers mug a white woman. Already we can see a plethora or stereotypes used to represent the characters. Jodie Whitaker is dressed as a stereotypical middle class woman with brighter clothing whilst John Boyega and his group are dressed in hoodies, baseball caps and bandanas (stereotypical). The surrounding graffiti and presence of knives heightens the negative representation of south London and its residents. The group speaks in thick south London dialect, using slang and a prominent accent to outline their residence and add to the stereotype. In contrast, Jodie Whitaker's character speaks with a more 'traditional' London accent. The ominous music used to establish danger is supported by the dark and cold lighting. In terms of camera work, low angles are used to add a sense of superiority to the gang, with high angles of the woman to make her appear weaker in comparison. Joe Cornish is aware that he is using many stereotypes and does this on purpose because the plot continues to unravel these stereotypes as it progresses.  

Following on from this section I watched the next 5 minutes. In this 5 minutes we are introduced to many new characters including a group of girls, an old woman and a boy called Brewis. We are presented more establishing shots of 'the block' from predominantly low angles to outline a sense of power. We can see a nail salon, the council estate and a social area which all support the working lass mood. Sam (Jodie Whitaker) meets this older white woman who is presented as middle class (like Sam) through the interior features of her apartment and her attire. She is dressed in what could be considered stereotypical clothing for an older upper class white woman which is supported by her well furnished and well lit apartment. When Sam is in this apartment with the lady the mood is very different. The soundtrack stops and the camera work is very slow and smooth with stable close-ups to outline Sam's comfortable and safe mental state in this setting. This is starkly contrasted by the dark lighting, non-diegetic sound, fast past cuts and handheld camera movement of the outdoor scenes including Moses and his gang. The sci-fi/hip-hop music which is used in the outdoor scenes to represent the situation and the characters featured adds further suspense. As well as using costuming, set design and dialect to create a stereotypical old white woman character the director also utilises these factors to introduce us to new stereotypes. The first stereotype represents working class girls from south London which is made evident by their abrasive outfits and thick south London dialect (slang and swearing) - similar to the group of boy. Brewis is an upper-class white man who only comes to the area to buy drugs, his outfit, hairstyle and accent all play into the upper-class stereotype which adds a sense of relatability and comedy when we hear him listening to boom-bap rap - possible admires the lifestyle of the other characters. 

Essay Question: "Representations in media texts are often simplistic and reinforce dominant ideologies so that audiences can make sense of them." Evaluate the ways that a media product you have studied has used or challenged simplistic representations. (12)     

"Attack the block" is a hybrid sci fi film directed by comedian Joe Cornish in 2011. Typically films use stereotypes more excessively than novels or series' as there is less time to form a detailed character development/ foundation. Attack the block is no exception from this convention however the director cleverly used stereotypes to create an underlying meaning in this light hearted film.  

At the start of the film Joe Cornish reinforces dominant UK ideologies through his use of stereotyping. It starts with a group of predominantly black youths in Brixton mugging a middle class white woman. This plays on white anxiety in London and reinforces the dominant ideologies of black youths being criminal and praying on white people, fuelled by the media. This is heavily supported through mis en scene, with the group of kids being stereotypically dressed in all black with bandanas, knives and baseball caps whilst the middle class woman is dressed in lighter and possibly less 'abrasive' clothing. This class divide is further illustrated through the use of dialogue — with the group speaking in a thick London accent and using slang whilst the woman speaks in 'proper english'. The dark setting with street art all serves to add to this dominant ideology and present the group of kids as dangerous to the woman. 

As the film progresses Joe Cornish starts to break and challenge these stereotypes which he established at the start of the film and I think that a key purpose of this film is to challenge the class system and dominant ideologies surrounding it in the UK. The main character Moses is firstly introduced as the most dangerous member of the group and the leader though his deeper voice, height difference and commanding mentality whilst also being the only person we see carry a knife. Towards the end we are able to see his true personality, the cowardly nature represented at the start is directly contrasted at the end when he becomes the hero and strives to save his block from the danger (which was originally him.) The inversion of his moral compass in this film paired with the companionship of the different classes and races portrayed in this block really flips the dominant ideologies reinforced at the start on their heads. The plot slowly unravels who Moses is as a character and shows that he is just a normal person like anyone else who's circumstances led him to go against who he truly is; this vulnerability and normality is outlined when Sam (white woman) is looking around his room and he has family portraits, spider-man bed covers etc. There is a pivotal and telling moment at the end when Sam is asked about Moses by the police, who think he is a criminal, when she says that he is just here neighbour. Unifying the class system. 


Genre 

Daniel Chandler's genre theory states that conventional definitions of genres tend to be based on the notion that they constitute particular conventions of content (such as themes or settings) and/or form (including structure and style) which shared by the texts which are regarded as belonging to them. Basically codes are things we see typically across productions in a genre and conventions are the methods they typically use. Attack the block genre codes and conventions: 

Referencing Attack the Block from 1:15 to 1:27, explain how generic codes and conventions have been used to create meaning (12) 

Attack the Block (d. Joe Cornish, 2011) is a hybrid genre film which does feature a slight socially commentary however the main purpose is for simple entertainment. The last 10 minutes display Attack the block's primary genres clearly and we are able to see the Horror/Action/Sci fi cross over conventions. 
Slow motion is a genre convention of most action films, in this section we can see the main protagonist Moses run in slow motion from the creatures. The director has done this because it adds tension and excitement to amplify the climax of the film to satisfy the audience's want for diversion and entertainment. Joe Cornish also uses the horror genre convention of slow paced editing and music at the start of the sequence in order to build tension and also heighten the severity of the climax and contrast the fast paced cuts in the ending sequence ― again this adds engagement and excitement. One convention implemented from the sci―fi genre is the use of CGI and although it may not be very high budget like the average scifi film it still represents and outerwordly being as with most films from this genre. This increases the unusual setting of the film, often a fictional event like this would occur in a big glamorous city or outer space however in this film aliens are invading a random council estate in south London never really shown in a horror, action or scifi film. This gives the film a USP in order to increase sales and memorability (even though unsuccessful.) As well as giving the film a unique selling point it also adds an aspect of interest for the audience as they aren't used to seeing it documented which has a deeper purpose ― attempting to tackle the asymmetrical judgment of the working class by the upper class. The single stranded narrative is typical of horror films and has been used in Attack the Block to give the audience a simple and predictable plot to follow, they don't have to watch the film with too much scrutiny and can just enjoy it which adds to the entertainment gratification. 

Narrative

Apply the concept of narrative to a media product you have studied (12)

'Attack the block' is a hybrid-genre film directed by comedian Joe Cornish in 2011. It focuses on a group of boys in South London fighting an alien invasion on their block. Narrative refers to the way in which stories are told, how meaning is constructed to achieve the understanding of the audience. In film, narrative is constructed through camera work, lighting, sound, mis-en-scene etc. We use them to make sense of our lives and the world. There are many approaches to understanding narratives devised by various philosophers over the years. 2000 years ago Aristotle observed that all narratives had a beginning, middle and end. Attack the block conforms to this as it has a very linear narrative with no flashbacks, multi-strands etc. The plot pretty much takes place in real time. There is a clear beginning where the boys are mugging the girl and a clear end where Moses is taken away in the police van. This film is also adherent to Toderov's narrative stages theory where there is a disturbance to equilibrium and then a resolution to form a new equilibrium. At the start of the film we see the stereotypical London equilibrium where a group of young black boys mug a middle class white woman. This equilibrium is then disturbed by an alien invasion on their block - the group of boys alongside the woman defeat these aliens (resolution) which creates the new equilibrium where the protagonist is seen as a hero as opposed to a coward. Theorist Vladimir Propp studied hundreds of Russian folk stories before deciding that all narratives have a common structure - they are shaped by different character types. He said there are 7 roles which any character may fall under in a narrative story. In Attack the Block there is a clear Villain (Aliens) and Hero (Moses.) Which indicates that this film also follows Levi Strauss' binary opposition theory where there is a conflict between one element and another and they directly contrast. In Attack the Block we are also able to notice most of Propp's other roles; Brewis is the donor in this film because he gives the hero knowledge that he wouldn't be able to restore equilibrium without. Many of the characters around the hero can be seen as helpers such as his friends, Sam etc because they make assist the hero in his quest. There is no clear false hero in this film and no clear dispatcher because they dispatch themselves. I would say that the 'Block' is probably the princess in this film as it is protected and seen as an objective by the hero. As I mentioned this film follows binary opposition theory where there is a conflict between two sides. Some examples of binary oppositions which Attack the Block displays include; black vs white, good vs evil, rich vs poor, boy vs girl, domestic vs foreign, young vs old and etc. In summary, Attack the Block is adhered to many narrative structures and theories such as Propp's character theory, Levi Strauss' binary opposition theory, Toderov's narrative stages theory and Aristotle's progression theory alongside many others. Its single stranded linear narrative means that it lends itself well to narrative codes and works well with the stereotypes and USP which is showcases. 

Regulation/effects theory

The BBFC is the film regulator in the UK. Their focus is on helping children and families choose which films are suitable to watch by providing them with guidance. Their responsibility/role is to protect children and vulnerable adults from imagery that will negatively affect them. They are industry funded and operated because the industry doesn't want government intervention as this creates further bias. The industry does not want to lose this privilege and therefore the BBFC is generally accurate and reliable. Trading standards and law enforcement officers have the power to seize illegal video works. The BBFC are designated by the department of culture, media and sport to provide evidence to help secure convictions under the terms of the video recordings act 1984. 
They have been classifying film in the UK for over 100 years and video for over 30. In 1909 the cinematograph act arrived which gave local authorities the power to provide or withold licenses for cinemas in their region. In 1912 the BBFC what created by the film industry to ensure uniformity for film classification decisions. Over the years legislation and categories developed to the (U,PG,12/12A,15,18,R) as well decisions over drugs and violence. They cut scenes out of many films in the past. The video recordings act was passed in 1984 and the BBFC was designated as the authority to regulate video (also changed form the British board of film censorship to the British board of film classification.) In 2002 12 was replaced by 12A meaning 12 or parent accompany. 
They regulate films exhibited at cinemas and video works such as television programmes, trailers, adverts, campaigns etc released in the UK. 
BBFC Age ratings: U - Suitable for all ages "should be set within a positive framework and should offered reassuring counterbalances to violence." PG - General viewing but some scenes may be unsuitable for young audiences "should not unsettle a child aged around eight or older." 12A - Not generally suitable for children aged under 12 and adults planning to take a child under 12 to a film must accompany them, no violent or antisocial behaviour endorsed. 15 - violent and unhealthy behaviour can be shown in further detail but on the whole it is not endorsed or dwelled on. 18- only exceptions to this are when it breaches law or is dangerous or explicit, no viewers under 18. 
Two case studies for example: 
Minions (Kyle Balda, 2015) distributed by Universal Pictures was given a U rating by the BBFC. They gave it this rating because there was only mild violence and language where no one is realistically hurt. There was controversy about this rating because of the torture scenes and noose in the trailer however I agree that overall it is suitable for everyone. 
13 reasons why (Tom McCarthy, 2016) distributed by Netflix was given an 18 after controversy about it's original 15 rating. This rating was increased because of how it dwelled on suicide alongside any other touchy subjects which they felt best placed it into 18. I agree with this decision because it could be too disturbing for a younger audience. 

Marketing

Ways in which 'Attack the Block' was advertised both above the line (ATL) and below the line (BTL.) 
Above the line marketing refers to forms of marketing which use mass media to market to a wide audience. Mediums such as radio, TV etc  when it is targeted wide instead of directly. The effectiveness and return investment is hard to calculate with ATL advertisement. One ATL method used to promote 'Attack the Block' was a website which had many tabs which gave information about the film, one of these tabs was called 'Game' which directed the viewer to iTunes where they were able to sell a soundtrack, podcast, the film itself and a game. They also released a Youtube trailer which got 2.5 million views and a positive like:dislike ratio which supports the overall positive reviews of the film on site like IMDb (6.8/10) Other methods of ATL used to promote the film include Posters, Magazine ads, Comic Con, Merchandise and social media pages. 
Below the line marketing refers to direct marketing where a person has had this film advertised to them based on their interests tailored by data collected on social media and google. What this means is that although many of the methods I talked about were ATL because anyone could stumble across them, the ways in which traffic was drawn to these platforms was most likely BTL through facebook ads, google analytics etc. For example if someone had watched a sci fi film trailer on youtube they may be recommended the Attack the Block trailer because they have been profiled as a sci fi fan. 

Saturday, March 20, 2021

TV Drama case studies

For this task I'll be comparing one TV drama I have previously watched and one that I haven't. This means watching a couple of episodes from a drama new to me. I'll be comparing Breaking bad (previously seen) and Killing eve (BBC 3) - looking at similarities, differences and how well they conform to genre conventions.  

What are the typical conventions of TV dramas?

As stated in my BBC research post - Television dramas work in a serialised format meaning it works in an episode to episode way with the the plot in each episode following on from the previous episode. They typically run for between 45 and 60 minutes and have opening branding/ credits which symbolically introduce the show. They are based on a fictional narrative which typically relies on the audience believing that the events could happen in real life - this makes the plot and characters gripping as viewers are able to apply the information. They are heavily character driven, providing audiences with emotional relation and pleasure. TV dramas feature a plethora of character types including: The Villain, The Donor, The helper, The princess, The false hero, The dispatcher and The Hero (Propp's theory.) As stated by Levi Strauss' opposition theory all of these characters are opposed by different characters. TV dramas have an ongoing structure, where normality is disturbed and then this disturbance is overcome which leads to a new normal, only for the cycle to continue. Audiences tend to have different expectations based on genres for example different types of criminals caught every episode in a crime drama. The audience get pleasure by learning more about the characters as the programme progresses, seeing how they interact and gaining an insight into their personal life which may not be seen by characters in the plot. 

How do my chosen dramas adhere to these conventions? 
Both programmes work in a serialised format with Breaking bad having 5 seasons (62 episodes) and Killing Eve has 3 seasons (24 episodes.) Episodes in both of these programmes are around 45 minutes long which is also adherent to the typical length of a television drama and gives them sufficient amounts of time to develop character narratives whilst retaining attention and giving deep detail. Both are also based on a fictional narrative which viewers can believe happens in real life - Breaking bad revolves around a high school teacher who cooks meth to pay for his caner treatment whilst Killing eve looks at a Mi6 agent who becomes obsessed with a female assassin. In both of these series the Villain and Hero are unclear and the audience feels aligned with both sides of the spectrum, the line between good and bad fades. In breaking bad the viewer switches frequently between understanding and sympathising with Walter (main character) as we can see the justification of him committing crimes. Similar to this, the audience can often feel annoyed at Eve (main character in Killing Eve) when she gest too engulfed in catching the assassin and her moral compass fades. I feel like this is narrative is effective is retaining the attention of the viewer because their opinion and how they relate to the characters constantly changes as more information is shared. Whilst the donor, the helper, the princess and the false hero often change in these dramas, they both have very clear dispatchers. In Breaking Bad the dispatcher is called 'Gus' and he is the cartel kingpin who controls Walter and how much he has to produce. In Killing Eve both sides have a clear dispatcher, Eve's dispatcher is called Carolyn and she assigns her places to visit and tasks to complete whilst Villainelle's dispatcher 'Konstantin' tells her who she has to kill. 

Audience pleasures

This theory was a popular approach to understanding the mass media consumer and states that there are 4 reasons why people consume different pieces of media. The first states that people consume media for the purpose of escapism/diversion and I think this is extremely relevant in TV dramas because they tend to be tailored very heavily towards entertainment and thrill seeking which is why the majority of them are aimed towards younger demographics. This is often supported through the use of fast paced visuals and music with lots of violence and conflict between good and bad. In Breaking Bad thrilling situations are often created by Walter narrowly escaping capture and in Killing Eve it is created through the conflict seen in Eve's relationships. Another reason people consume media is for the purpose of surveillance, gaining an insight into how others live and educating yourself. I think this is a valid gratification for Killing Eve and Breaking Bad because we are given a lot of insight into the characters personal relationships and the viewer is able to understand how and why different characters interact how they do. In Killing Eve we see Eve's relationship with her husband deteriorate as they plot progresses, showing the audience personal moments and interactions which no other character in the plot sees. Similarly, in Breaking Bad the audience sees lots of very intimate moments not seen by other characters such as his relationships, partners and plans. This all serves to add excitement and grips the viewer as they feel like they are gaining from consuming the episodes. Another key reason as to why people consume media is to try identify with the producer and aspects within a piece of media as well as to help form and develop their own personal identity. Killing Eve satisfies this audience pleasure by showing many different character archetypes and not really using any devices to portray these characters as good or bad - this means the viewers are able to form their own opinions and decide which characters they best identify with. Breaking Bad satisfies this audience pleasure by leaning way more towards Walter, making the audience like and feel for him despite him committing very illegal crimes - to remind us that what Walter does is illegal he is opposed by many different characters and this constantly flips the spectrum, changing the viewers' opinions on whether or not they want to identify with the protagonist. This adds interest as it distorts the audiences' moral compass which forces them to think deeper and evaluate. The final reason people view different forms of media relates to personal relationships. There are two strands involved, one is for the purpose of seeing how people in media form and maintain their own personal relationships then comparing to our own, and the other is so that we can form our own relationships with other viewers (being able to talk to someone about a piece of media.) Breaking bad had a record breaking 10.3 million viewers and Killing Eve had 8.3 million viewers. This insanely high viewership means that many people will have been able to talk about the programmes and likely formed relationships or found out about the programmes by talking - all showing that this is a prevalent audience pleasure of popular TV dramas. In addition both of these productions give insight into how different characters manage their relationships whilst hiding deep secrets such as stabbing a lady or being a drug dealer. Often showing the consequences of hiding things from your partner and the toll it can take on everyone involved which cold be applied to viewers' own relationships.